Georgia is reaching a turning point in its energy history as AI-fueled datacenter construction drives record electricity demand. The state’s largest utility, Georgia Power, has requested an unprecedented 10 gigawatts of additional energy to meet facilities’ needs at an estimated cost of nearly $16 billion.
The company says this expansion is essential to future growth, but critics warn it could raise power bills and tie the state into decades of fossil fuel dependence.
As the state’s Public Service Commission (PSC) prepares to rule on the request, public scrutiny is intensifying. Environmental groups and political groupss argue that corporate energy use is being prioritized over fairness, transparency, and climate responsibility. The debate comes ahead of a major PSC election that could shift the commission’s makeup for the first time in nearly 20 years.
Why It Matters: Georgia’s energy debate mirrors national and global challenges around how to govern the power demands of artificial intelligence. It raises key questions about how energy markets should adapt and what policies can keep datacenters from straining grids or avoiding oversight?
- Power Request to Fuel Datacenter Growth: Georgia Power is seeking approval for a 10-gigawatt energy expansion, enough to power more than 8 million homes. The state’s PSC says roughly 80% of that increase would serve AI datacenters, not households or small businesses. Backed by major tech firms, these facilities have turned metro Atlanta into a national hub for datacenter construction and positioned Georgia at the center of U.S. AI infrastructure development.
- Concern Over Rates and Transparency: During this week’s hearings, over 20 advocacy organizations rallied communities to attend and voice their concerns. Many worry about rising electricity costs, noting that since 2023, the PSC has approved six rate increases for Georgia Power. Critics argue that these cost spikes are being driven by corporate consumption and are calling for more transparency in how utility decisions are made.
- Regulatory Structures Are Ill-Equipped for AI-Driven Grid Expansion: The Georgia PSC wasn’t built to manage the pace or scale of energy changes now driven by cloud computing and AI. Without standardized rules on contract transparency, renewable sourcing, or peak usage tariffs, utilities can pass expansion costs onto the broader grid. Georgia’s case shows how legacy regulatory bodies may lack the tools to manage AI-era infrastructure fairly or sustainably.
- AI Infrastructure Growth Risks Locking in Fossil Fuel Dependency: Although utilities describe expansion as a technological need, adding natural gas turbines could lock fossil fuels into the grid at a time when decarbonization is critical. Across the country, infrastructure may become a long-term driver of fossil fuel use unless regulators require renewable alternatives. Georgia’s hearings have brought this risk into focus, with environmental groups warning of the climate cost of weak energy sourcing standards.
- Political Shifts May Determine the Future of Grid Governance in the AI Age: Georgia’s upcoming PSC elections could reshape how the state and potentially others regulate corporate electricity consumption. If seats are overturned, it would end a two-decade Republican hold on the commission and potentially steer regulatory focus toward renewable integration. More broadly, the politicization of energy regulation amid AI expansion may drive a new generation of energy governance.
Trusted insights for technology leaders
Our readers are CIOs, CTOs, and senior IT executives who rely on The National CIO Review for smart, curated takes on the trends shaping the enterprise, from GenAI to cybersecurity and beyond.
Subscribe to our 4x a week newsletter to keep up with the insights that matter.
