Curated Content | Thought Leadership | Technology News

Coding Under Watch: Government-Enforced Cybersecurity

Secure or stifled?
Emory Odom
Contributing Writer

National Cyber Director Harry Coker emphasized the need for stronger cybersecurity measures in software development, highlighting efforts to establish liability for software manufacturers that compromise security by rushing code to market. Coker’s focus on improving software measurability and advocating for memory safe programming languages attempts to address vulnerabilities exploited by cybercriminals.

The push for government intervention in software security, while aimed at enhancing cybersecurity, also raises concerns about potential overreach. Such involvement necessitates a delicate balance to avoid stifling innovation or burdening developers with excessive regulation, highlighting the importance of crafting policies that protect consumers and national interests without impeding technological advancement.

Why it matters: The delicate equilibrium between government intervention and technological advancement is crucial. On one hand, there’s a clear need to protect national interests and consumer safety against escalating cyber threats. On the other, there’s a growing apprehension that excessive regulation could dampen the spirit of innovation that drives the tech industry forward.

  • Importance of Secure Coding Practices: The push for memory-safe programming languages underlines a proactive approach to eliminate common vulnerabilities. This move sets new benchmarks for software development, aiming to integrate security from the ground up while also challenging developers to adapt to new standards.
  • Enhancing National Cybersecurity: This strategy is part of a comprehensive effort to shield national infrastructure from cyber threats, particularly those emanating from adversarial nations. The focus on creating a secure digital infrastructure underscores the critical nature of cybersecurity in safeguarding national security and economic stability.
  • Potential for Overreach: Concerns arise that stringent regulations may hinder technological innovation, imposing burdens on developers and potentially stifling the dynamic evolution of technology. The balance sought is one where security does not come at the cost of innovation.
  • The Role of the Private Sector: Emphasizing collaboration between the government and the private sector recognizes the indispensable role of private innovation and infrastructure in national cybersecurity. This partnership is crucial for developing and implementing effective security measures, balancing regulatory guidance with industry expertise.

Go Deeper -> Coker: ONCD is studying ‘liability regimes’ for software flaws – The Record

×
You have free article(s) left this month courtesy of CIO Partners.

Enter your username and password to access premium features.

Don’t have an account? Join the community.

Would You Like To Save Articles?

Enter your username and password to access premium features.

Don’t have an account? Join the community.

Register for Unlimited Access

Already a member?

Digital Monthly

$12.00/ month

Billed Monthly

Digital Annual

$10.00/ month

Billed Annually

Would You Like To Save Books?

Enter your username and password to access premium features.

Don’t have an account? Join the community.

Log In To Access Premium Features

Sign Up For A Free Account

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name