Curated Content | Thought Leadership | Technology News

Chief Scapegoat Officer No More

White House considers ban on ransomware payments.
TNCR Staff
CISOs

The issue of Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) burnout is of paramount importance for both CISOs and their companies. Over the past decade, the prevalence of cyberattacks has surged, leading to more intricate and expansive attack surfaces that CISOs are responsible for safeguarding. Coupled with tightening budgets and an ever-increasing pressure to do more with less, it’s unsurprising that a majority of U.S. CISOs admit to experiencing burnout.

Regrettably, when security breaches and ransomware incidents unfold, CISOs frequently bear the brunt of the blame. This may not be justifiable in principle, but it’s an all-too-common scenario. When a breach occurs, irrespective of whether it’s due to internal negligence or third-party vulnerabilities, organizations frequently opt to replace the CISO as an attempt to restore customer trust and appease the board.

Nonetheless, there’s a potential shift on the horizon. The White House’s contemplation of a ransom payment ban, which could extend cybersecurity discussions to the CEO, CFO, and board levels, signifies a seismic change. If enacted, this ban would broaden accountability beyond the CISO to encompass top-level executives.

Why it matters: For businesses, C-suite, and board members, this development should spark careful contemplation. The narrative of the “Chief Scapegoat Officer” may gradually give way to a more comprehensive perspective.

  • A ransom ban by the White House would broaden the scope of responsibility for cyber and ransomware attacks. It would also incentivize CEOs and CFOs to proactively spend more on cybersecurity.
  • The crucial shift that’s required involves a transition in responsibility. It’s essential for boards and CEOs to create robust processes for security spending prioritization and real-time accountability. The onus should rest on the highest levels of leadership to ensure adequate resourcing and alignment of cybersecurity priorities, rather than disproportionately burdening CISOs or CIOs.
  • In the end, it’s about driving collective action, promoting proactive cybersecurity investments, and fostering a culture of cyber resilience that involves everyone from the boardroom to the front lines of defense.

Go Deeper —>

×
You have free article(s) left this month courtesy of CIO Partners.

Enter your username and password to access premium features.

Don’t have an account? Join the community.

Would You Like To Save Articles?

Enter your username and password to access premium features.

Don’t have an account? Join the community.

Save My Spot For TNCR LIVE!

Thursday April 18th

9 AM Pacific / 11 PM Central / 12 PM Eastern

Register for Unlimited Access

Already a member?

Digital Monthly

$12.00/ month

Billed Monthly

Digital Annual

$10.00/ month

Billed Annually

CIOs OTM Roundup
NASA, Proctor & Gamble, Chipotle, Okta, and Johns Hopkins.

Would You Like To Save Books?

Enter your username and password to access premium features.

Don’t have an account? Join the community.

Log In To Access Premium Features

Sign Up For A Free Account

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Newsletters