Artificial intelligence continues to move beyond research labs and niche tools, taking on a growing role in medical diagnostics, government operations, education, and defense. With that expansion, concerns persist over uneven oversight and fragmented national policies that leave gaps in how AI is managed across borders.
In response, the United Nations has established two global institutions: the Global Dialogue on AI Governance and the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI.
Both were created through a resolution adopted unanimously by Member States in August 2025 and formally launched during a high-level General Assembly meeting on September 25.
Their purpose is to bring together governments, scientists, civil society organizations, and private sector leaders in a single forum for ongoing collaboration, with the aim of moving from fragmented policies to more coherent frameworks that reflect both scientific expertise and international consensus.
Why It Matters: AI systems are already shaping outcomes across national borders, yet current rules are uneven and often limited to individual countries. The new UN institutions mark the first coordinated attempt to manage AI’s development through shared international structures that include a full range of perspectives.
- Establishment of the Global Dialogue on AI Governance: This forum will serve as an ongoing space where national governments, private companies, technical experts, and civil society representatives can share data, report major AI incidents, and compare national strategies. While the Dialogue does not have enforcement power, its goal is to enable voluntary alignment across countries by providing a centralized venue for exchange. Unlike previous efforts limited to smaller alliances or economic blocs, the Dialogue includes all 193 UN Member States by default.
- Role of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI: Structured to operate independently within the UN system, the panel will deliver annual public reports on emerging developments in AI, with an emphasis on identifying systemic risks, assessing claims of capability, and outlining possible impacts on institutions and economies. These reports are expected to serve as a technical foundation for debates at the Global Dialogue and are intended to raise the quality of evidence used in international decision-making.
- Closing Gaps in Global Coordination: A UN report from 2024 found that most countries had no formal role in any global AI oversight process. The newly launched structures aim to address this absence by offering platforms for international consultation without imposing legal mandates on national governments. This “soft governance” model favors transparency and cooperation while avoiding jurisdictional conflicts, particularly over data sovereignty and technological standards.
- Concerns About Power Concentration and Influence: Delegates from multiple regions, including China and African Union nations, expressed concern that, without safeguards, AI oversight could become dominated by a few highly developed countries or major technology companies. The new international process is intended to give smaller economies and emerging markets more opportunities to participate in global decision-making. However, questions remain about how influence will be distributed in practice and whether structural imbalances will persist.
- Calls for Clear Boundaries and Accountability: During the General Assembly session, experts and public figures called for the international community to define baseline restrictions on AI development. Proposals included mandatory safety evaluations and public reporting requirements for high-impact models. Although no specific regulatory mechanisms were outlined, the discussion reflected rising urgency to set collective boundaries before more advanced systems are deployed at scale.
Go Deeper -> UN moves to close dangerous void in AI governance – UN News
Countries Consider A.I.’s Dangers and Benefits at U.N. – The New York Times
Trusted insights for technology leaders
Our readers are CIOs, CTOs, and senior IT executives who rely on The National CIO Review for smart, curated takes on the trends shaping the enterprise, from GenAI to cybersecurity and beyond.
Subscribe to our 4x a week newsletter to keep up with the insights that matter.
