The White House is preparing an executive order aimed at ending the ability of individual U.S. states to regulate artificial intelligence (AI). The draft, obtained by several news outlets, would authorize federal agencies to challenge state-level AI laws in court and withhold federal funding from non-compliant states, including funds from the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program.
The order is a renewed push to implement a uniform, national AI policy more geared towards industry interests.
It has triggered sharp reactions from lawmakers, civil rights groups, and tech accountability advocates, who warn that bypassing state regulations could lead to unchecked use of AI systems with significant societal risks.
Why It Matters: This proposal could redefine the roles of federal and state governments in AI oversight. With many states taking the lead in crafting AI regulations in the absence of national laws, the draft order raises questions about how regulatory responsibilities will be divided going forward.
- Legal Authority and Implementation: The draft executive order calls for the establishment of an “AI Litigation Task Force” within the Department of Justice, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi. The task force would assess state-level AI laws and pursue legal action if they are determined to conflict with federal authority. Grounds for legal challenges may include claims that state laws interfere with interstate commerce or contradict existing federal rules.
- Funding Conditions for States: The order instructs Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to notify states with AI laws under legal review that they may be ineligible to receive money through the federal Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program. This program, totaling over $42 billion, supports broadband expansion across states and territories. The proposed condition introduces funding considerations into the broader debate over AI policy enforcement.
- Industry Perspective on Uniformity: Supporters of the order include several technology companies and investors who prefer consistent national regulations. Organizations such as OpenAI and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz have voiced concerns that a state-by-state approach could lead to overlapping or conflicting rules, which they argue may affect product development timelines and resource planning.
- Reactions From State Lawmakers and Members of Congress: Some elected officials have expressed concern about the order’s potential impact on state authority. New York Assemblymember Alex Bores, who co-sponsored an AI bill, described the proposal as limiting states’ options to respond to technology-related risks. Lawmakers from both major parties, including Senator Mark Warner and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, have questioned whether restricting state-level regulation would delay broader oversight.
- Input From Advocacy and Policy Groups: Advocacy groups have submitted letters to Congress opposing efforts to limit state regulation of AI. These groups cite areas such as misinformation, hiring algorithms, and youth safety as issues where they believe immediate action is needed. They argue that until comprehensive federal regulations are established, states should maintain the ability to enact their own laws.
Go Deeper -> White House crafting executive order to thwart state AI laws – CNBC
Trump renews effort to block states from regulating AI, raising alarms about safety – CNN
Trusted insights for technology leaders
Our readers are CIOs, CTOs, and senior IT executives who rely on The National CIO Review for smart, curated takes on the trends shaping the enterprise, from GenAI to cybersecurity and beyond.
Subscribe to our 4x a week newsletter to keep up with the insights that matter.
