AI chat tools have quickly become a familiar part of digital life. Since late 2022, platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot have moved from early trials into widespread use across consumer and enterprise settings.
Just as a lighthouse cuts through fog to guide ships safely to shore, search engines continue to be the dependable beacon for fact-based decision-making. AI tools now illuminate new possibilities and offer creative directions, but when the goal is to reach a precise and trustworthy answer, search remains the guiding light. For enterprise IT teams, this distinction shapes how knowledge tools are adopted, governed, and integrated into existing decision-making processes.
These changes have led to growing speculation that traditional search engines, particularly Google, may soon be replaced by AI-driven systems.
Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky recently pushed back on this assumption, saying that AI agents are “not the new Google” and remain too immature to replace the scope, reliability, and trust that search delivers. His comments reflect a broader reality for enterprise IT leaders: while AI offers powerful new capabilities, its outputs are not yet dependable enough to stand alone in high-stakes decision-making.
However, data on how people actually find and use information does not support the idea that search is disappearing. While AI adoption is increasing, search engine traffic continues to grow as well. Most users rely on both, but for different purposes.
AI is well-suited for early exploration.
It helps users ask broad questions and test out ideas. Meanwhile, search remains the preferred tool for locating facts and completing tasks. In enterprise workflows, this often means AI is used to brainstorm IT strategies, summarize vendor proposals, or explore new technologies, but teams still turn to search engines and verified repositories for compliance standards, configuration documentation, or vendor comparisons.
For now, the two are used side-by-side, each serving a distinct role.
Why It Matters: Search engines remain the backbone of enterprise information discovery, while AI tools deliver speed and support for ideation. Understanding their distinct strengths and their very different risk profiles is essential for IT leaders shaping digital strategy. AI’s lack of source transparency can introduce governance, compliance, and reputational risks if relied on as the sole decision driver, while search offers verifiable information and multiple perspectives. Treating the two systems as interchangeable risks gaps in visibility and misplaced investment, so effective planning means understanding precisely how each is used.
- Search Engine Use Has Not Declined: Daily use of AI chatbots is increasing, with over 60 percent of users now engaging with them regularly. Even so, half of those users report no change in how often they turn to search engines, and nearly a third say they are using search more than before. In 2024, Google’s search volume grew by more than 20 percent year over year. Rather than displacing search, AI tools are being layered into existing habits, serving new functions without replacing old ones.
- AI Is Used for Exploration and Search for Precision: AI chat tools are commonly used at the beginning of a task. They help users organize early thoughts or draft content. These interactions are open-ended and benefit from conversational exchanges. Search engines, on the other hand, are used when the goal is clear. People turn to them to verify vendor SLAs, locate compliance documentation, or benchmark technology costs. In enterprise terms, AI might help outline a migration plan, but search is used to verify vendor specifications or locate authoritative standards. The choice between the two depends on the nature of the task rather than the design of the tool.
- AI Tools Offer a Single Answer, Search Engines Provide Options: A chatbot typically responds with one suggested answer. A search engine returns a range of sources, each with links and varying levels of detail. This structure allows users to verify and choose. The depth and transparency of search results make them the more reliable choice.
- Google’s AI Features Are Part of Search, Not a Replacement for It: AI-generated summaries now appear at the top of some Google results. They offer a quick overview, but the rest of the results page remains unchanged. Users continue to scroll, open links, and compare sources. These summaries add convenience, but they do not change the core function of the platform. Search still depends on access to a broad set of results. For IT leaders, this trend highlights convergence rather than replacement; policies will increasingly need to account for AI-augmented search within existing enterprise tools.
- AI and Search Are Used at Different Points in the Process: Users often turn to AI at the start of a task when the goal is still undefined. It helps frame possibilities or summarize unfamiliar material. But when the task moves from planning to execution, search takes over. People return to search engines for reliable details and direct access to sources. The distinction between the two has remained consistent, even as AI continues to improve.
AI agents aren’t the ‘new Google,’ says Airbnb CEO – TechCrunch
Trusted insights for technology leaders
Our readers are CIOs, CTOs, and senior IT executives who rely on The National CIO Review for smart, curated takes on the trends shaping the enterprise, from GenAI to cybersecurity and beyond.
Subscribe to our 4x a week newsletter to keep up with the insights that matter.
